Last week I popped over to Paris to take part in a short UNESCO Working Group meeting. After arriving mid-evening on the Eurostar, I decided to walk the one hour or so to my hotel. There’s no better way of seeing a city. Among the usual sites I gradually became more and more aware of the number of young families – refugees – begging on the streets. Children no older than my own sitting out in the cold and dark with nothing as their childhoods drifted away. As a father myself I find dealing with this extremely difficult, something I spoke about at TEDxMunich last year.
I doubled back and gave one family the €5 note I had in my bag. A pathetic gesture given their position. But the hopelessness of the situation did get me thinking again about random acts of kindness, and the act of ‘giving out of kindness and nothing more’. I wrote about some of this a little while ago here.
With this fresh in my mind, the day after I got back I decided to try out a little experiment. I posted a Twitter poll to see if I could get the answer to a question that had been on my mind for a while. I had no idea what to expect and, although the sample size wasn’t fantastic, I was encouraged enough by the results to work a little more on the idea.
So, over the weekend I posted up a call on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn for contributors to do just that – donate an unconditional amount to a stranger each month. I upped the monthly payment a little, asking for monthly contributions of $15/£10, and capped the commitment at 12 months. By the time the weekend was out, over 30 people had pledged to help. Pledges have continued to come in.
Through a trusted, long-time contact in Nigeria we have already identified ten women and their families as recipients of the monthly donations. Assuming everyone goes through with their pledge, every family will receive approximately $50 each month which, based on our initial conversations with them will give an average of a 50% increase in disposable income.
There are two sets of wider questions I’ve been wanting to answer by doing this.
On the contributor side
- Would people be happy to give money without knowing how it was going to be spent?
- Would people be happy to give money without knowing anything about the recipient?
- Would people be happy to give money without any guarantee of impact or results?
- Are people happy giving ‘just’ to help make someones life easier, and to give them hope?
- At what level of giving do these things not matter?
- At what level of giving do these things matter?
- Do people need ‘trusted intermediaries’ (i.e. charities) in order to feel comfortable giving?
- How important is the feeling of a direct connection with the recipient?
- How important is full transparency and honesty/openness in a project like this?
- Is there a future for this kind of giving?
On the receiver side
- What difference does it make in the lives of the recipients knowing that people are willing to help them?
- Does giving them hope and the potential to improve their lives make any difference to them and their families?
- What do they choose to spend the money on?
- What impact does it have that the money is unconditional?
- Is there any long term impact of receiving this help over a 12 month period?
- Is there a future for this kind of receiving?
Long-time friend Marieme Jamme has already raised concerns about the notion of ‘experimenting’ with a group of women, drawing parallels with the many other development efforts and pilots that treat target African populations as guinea pigs for Western ideas. I have worked hard throughout my career to work closely with grassroots organisations, and to empower local actors. Although I appreciate her concerns, I believe making the gift unconditional, and over an extended period, genuinely gives these women and their families a chance to better their lives, and everyone involved in the project is doing it for the right reasons, and out of a desire to be part of something that might make a difference.
The project also potentially answers some very interesting – and potentially disruptive – questions around the nature of personal, direct, unconditional giving. Charities spend huge amounts of time and money making the case for their projects, and collecting evidence to prove impact (which sometimes, if we’re honest, isn’t as accurate as we’d like it to be).
If enough people are willing to give a modest amount without worrying too much about the guarantees most charities think they need and want, how much more good can be done? How many more people might give? What might this mean for the future of personal, charitable giving?
The parameters of the project are still being decided with the contributors, but it is our intention to be as open and transparent as possible about what we’re doing, and how we’re doing it – so expect some kind of project website soon.
In the meantime, if you’re interested in what we’re doing feel free to comment or get in touch.
Further reading on some of the thinking behind the project can be found here