Appropriate technology: Lessons from nature

“Our life is half natural and half technological. Half-and-half is good. You cannot deny that high-tech is progress. We need it for jobs. Yet if you make only high-tech, you make war. So we must have a strong human element to keep modesty and natural life”

Nam June Paik, Artist (1932 – 2006)

There’s a saying in the technology world which asks “What would Google do?”. When I’m confronted with a problem, I’d rather ask “What would nature do?”. Why? Well, if you believe Google have the answer then you’re immediately assuming that modern technology – in some shape or form – is the solution. More often than not that’s the wrong place to start.

I recently sat on a panel at the Aspen Environment Forum which focused on the use of social media in the environmental movement. (You can watch the video here, or read my summary of whole the event here). Many people had already made their minds up that Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and so on were ‘the’ answer, before really thinking through what they were really trying to do, what their message was, or who the different audiences would be. That’s also the wrong place to start.

Asking what nature might do immediately pulls us away from looking for a modern, high-tech solution and more towards a simpler, low-tech (and potentially more appropriate and sustainable) one. It also encourages us to think entirely out-of-the-box.

So, if you were to ask “What might nature do?”, what kind of solutions might you come up with which you otherwise might not have?

1. Elephants

Some of my earliest mobile work back in 2003 was in Southern Africa where I was asked to help understand and apply modern communications technology to local conservation efforts. One of the bigger problems people were trying to tackle back then was human-elephant conflict – elephants ‘encroaching’ on farmland and destroying livelihoods literally overnight. In response, some farmers resorted to poisoning or shooting elephants. Not a good conservation outcome.

All kinds of modern technology solutions were proposed, and many trialled, to try and solve the problem. Electric fences, RFID tagging, sensors and live-GSM-tracking among them. Few proved as successful as hoped, or particularly replicable or affordable.

So, what might nature do?

It turns out that elephants run a mile when they encounter bees. According to this BBC article, early research in Kenya indicates hives can be a very effective barrier, so much so that 97% of attempted elephant raids were aborted. Where satellites, RFID tags and mobile phones failed, humble honey bees might just be the answer.

2. Pigeons

Each summer, as tennis players battle it out on the lawn courts at Wimbledon, the authorities do battle trying to stop pigeons interfering with play. All manner of modern technology is available to deter birds – lasers and radio controlled aircraft to gas guns and ultrasound emitters. Again, each have varying degrees of success and many can be expensive.

What would nature do?

Wimbledon’s answer doesn’t involve anything more high-tech than a bird of prey. A few laps by Rufus around the tennis courts are enough to scare the hardiest of pigeons away. No batteries – or lasers, or sound emitters – required. Simple, sustainable and replicable.

3. Wasps

You’d be forgiven for thinking that the grandly-named “Waspinator” was a little black box with wires, buttons and flashing lights. No doubt there have been attempts to develop high-tech wasp deterrents in the past, but the Waspinator isn’t one of them. In fact, if you saw one you’d likely be a little disappointed. This particular solution looks like nothing more than a brown paper bag. But don’t be fooled – nature has very much influenced its development.

According to the website:

The Waspinator is a fake wasps nest. Wasps are very territorial and will aggressively defend their nest against wasps from another colony. When a foraging wasp sees another wasps nest it will rapidly leave the area for fear of being attacked by the nest’s defenders.

Wasps have a very long range of vision and when they see a Waspinator they think it’s an enemy wasps nest and quickly leave the area for somewhere safer, leaving the area around the Waspinator completely free of wasps

It couldn’t be simpler. And no moving parts (if you exclude the wasps).

So, drawing on these examples, what five lessons does nature teach us?

1. Understand the context of your target audience/user.
2. Use locally available materials wherever possible.
3. Low-tech is not poor-tech.
4. Keep it simple.
5. The answer is likely already out there.

Next time we look to develop a technology solution to a problem, we might be best asking what nature might do before turning to the likes of Google, or any high-tech solution provider for that matter. Mother Nature usually knows best.

48 thoughts on “Appropriate technology: Lessons from nature

  1. Pingback: Sitaram Shastri
  2. Pingback: James Hugman
  3. Pingback: Axsis
  4. Pingback: Steve Finikiotis
  5. Pingback: Alicia Arnold
  6. Pingback: Deb Mills-Scofield
  7. Pingback: dolbyarun
  8. Pingback: tom serona
  9. Pingback: Daraja
  10. Pingback: Twaweza - ni sisi
  11. Pingback: Twaweza - ni sisi
  12. Pingback: Ken Banks
  13. Pingback: Morgan Barke
  14. Pingback: Ken Banks
  15. Pingback: Ken Banks
  16. Pingback: William Powers
  17. Pingback: C. Daryl Edwards
  18. Pingback: KPMG's BraveBanana
  19. Pingback: Mylee Joseph
  20. Pingback: Éowyn
  21. Pingback: Josh Fenton
  22. Pingback: Ken Banks
  23. Pingback: Tweeted Times Top
  24. Pingback: salbertson
  25. Pingback: Monica
  26. Pingback: TJ Thomander
  27. Pingback: Alex Batko
  28. Pingback: Chris Future
  29. Pingback: Jenna Crowder
  30. Pingback: TechChange
  31. Pingback: Ken Banks
  32. Pingback: majaliwa
  33. Pingback: lucasgonzalez
  34. Pingback: Ken Banks
  35. Pingback: Steve Pike
  36. Pingback: RJ
  37. Pingback: Guillaume du Toit
  38. Pingback: Ken Banks
  39. Pingback: CAFOD Policy
  40. Pingback: lovisa
  41. Pingback: umwiza
  42. Pingback: MadeGood
  43. Pingback: Andre James
  44. Pingback: Pedro Santiago

Comments are closed.